Alec Bohm
- Free agent est. 2 yr × $5.5M ($2M–$11M) · +0.2 wins to Pittsburgh’s Winter Plan as a bench bat
- PNC Park Pittsburgh’s home park: −0.6 runs per 600 PA against an average park (−0.06 wins over 565 PA; his WAR leaves this out); home runs ×0.78 (×0.77 for right-handed hitters as a group). Park Fit →
Hitting · 2026 percentiles
vs. MLB hitters with 300+ PA · 631 PA
Platoon splits · swing path
By pitcher handedness
| vs | PA | wOBA | xwOBA | K% | BB% | Chase | Decisions | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHP | 193 | .365 | .337 | 12% | 5% | 29% | −0.84 | +1.55 |
| RHP | 438 | .302 | .325 | 15% | 8% | 25% | +0.53 | +0.04 |
- Attack angle
- 5.1° (46% in 5–20°)
- Attack direction
- +4.4°
- Swing length
- 7.2 ft
- Fast-swing rate
- 13%
- Pull-air %
- 8.7%
- Hard-hit %
- 43.9%
- Slash · wRC+
- .249/.315/.383 · 90
Zone map · 2026
Where he does damage, and where to pitch him
Does the most damage middle-middle (+3.5 vs. league per 100; 1.9 standard errors on 146 pitches, inside the noise for the best of nine cells).
Weakest down and in (−4.1), but only 2.0 standard errors from average on 101 pitches: no in-zone spot to attack yet.
Runs per 100 pitches vs. an average RHB: better · worse. Catcher’s view · 2,108 pitches · faded cells are within one standard error of average. A spot is called only when it is farther from average than the best or worst of nine average cells gets 95% of the time (set from the league’s own pitches: about 3 standard errors above, 2 below).
Most similar hitters
Swings like Bohm: bat path, contact quality and approach
| Similarity | Player | xwOBA | ’26 WAR | ’27 proj | 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | Alejandro Kirk TOR · ’98 | .308 | 2.8 | 2.8 | Signed $12.3M |
| 61 | Maikel Garcia KC · ’00 | .318 | 1.8 | 2.3 | Signed $7.2M |
| 60 | Otto Lopez MIA · ’98 | .329 | 5.9 | 3.5 | Arb |
| 58 | Ke'Bryan Hayes CIN · ’97 | .284 | −1.3 | −0.2 | Signed $7.0M |
| 57 | Masataka Yoshida BOS · ’93 | .318 | 0.4 | 0.1 | Signed $18.6M |
Nearest neighbours on bat speed, swing length, attack angle, squared-up and blast rates, EV90, barrels, pull-air, chase, zone contact, K% and BB%. 2026 regulars only.
Fielding
2027 rating at every position he can play · OAA by position · range by direction · tools. Same engine as the Fielding Lab and the Winter Plan.
| Season | Pos | OAA | Range | Arm, DP | Runs | Batters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1B | −3 | −2 | −1.0 | −3.0 | 1,783 |
| 2026 | 3B | −8 | −6 | −0.1 | −6.1 | 3,890 |
| 2025 | 1B | 0 | 0 | −0.8 | −0.8 | 508 |
| 2025 | 3B | −2 | −2 | −1.8 | −3.8 | 3,940 |
| 2024 | 1B | +2 | +1 | 0.0 | +1.0 | 458 |
| 2024 | 3B | +3 | +2 | −2.0 | 0.0 | 4,613 |
| 2023 | 1B | −6 | −5 | +0.5 | −4.5 | 2,371 |
| 2023 | 3B | +2 | +1 | −0.2 | +0.8 | 2,864 |
Runs = range plus his arm and double-play runs spread over his positions by outs (Fielding Run Value, from 2023): what the rating counts.
At 3B in 2026, the biggest loss came in (charging) (−7 outs): a coaching target.
Tools (percentile; arm among 3Bs)| Season | Zone | Balls | Outs vs. exp. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3B | 259 | −12.2 |
| 2026 | 1B | 101 | −1.5 |
| 2025 | 3B | 314 | +0.6 |
| 2024 | 3B | 424 | −4.3 |
The zone rating counts every ball hit to his part of the field while he played there, his club’s positioning included; Savant OAA uses his actual starting spot and is the better individual grade. They agree best in the outfield. See the model card.
Contract & projection
Club control (RosterResource) · Keystone projected WAR
A pending free agent: no club controls his 2027. Contract Studio →
Minor leagues
MLB Stats API · public box-score data
| SeasonLevel | Level | Team | Age | G | PA / IP | PA / IP ·Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025AAA | AAA | Lehigh Valley IronPigs | 28 | 5 | 22 PA | 22 PA · .143/.182/.381 · 1 HR · 9.1% K · 4.5% BB |
ABS challenges · 2026
Baseball Savant